FastCopy 5.11.1 | Pro | Portable | RePack by elchupacabra


FastCopy is the Fastest Copy/Backup Software on Windows. It supports UNICODE and over MAX_PATH (260 characters) file pathnames. Because it uses multi-threads for Read/Write/Verify, Overlapped I/O, Direct I/O, so it brings out the best speed of devices. It supports Include/Exclude filter like a UNIX wildcard. It runs fast and does not hog resources, because MFC is not used. (Designed using Win32 API and C Runtime only)

Screenshots

Homepage | What's New
OS: Windows XP / Vista / 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10 / 11 (x86-x64)
Language: ML / ENG / +RUS / +UKR
Medicine: FreeWare / Patch 3.0 by ZD423 for 5.x / Activator 5.x Activator 1.1 by RadiXX11 / Crack by xanax
Size: 3,26 MB.
Download From Homepage
Installer & Portable
Login or register to see spoiler's content

Login or register to see spoiler's content

Login or register to see spoiler's content

Login or register to see spoiler's content

Login or register to see spoiler's content

Login or register to see spoiler's content
Reasons for raising the release: Added RePack
Share:
Twitter Twitter Twitter Facebook Twitter Share
, , , , , , ,

13 comments

iVents
File Not Found Error  02

 

Download Portable 4.1.7 (Links for Users)

UserUpload.net
sandra324
Wait for the portable of the current version, please
Dimar0n
Added Portable 06
knopka
Totally unnecessary program and everything is copied fine as it is
aleksandar
5.10.0
The portable version pops up an «Illegal Command» when run.
It seems that both versions of FastCopy.exe are fake cracks with only «Pro» in the title but without Perfect Verify.
Dimar0n
I have no problem. It looks like this is your local problem.
aleksandar
I tested it in Windows Sandbox, and only the x86 version works. Although the portable version can be opened and run in the sandbox, since it is an x64 version, the registration crack remains invalid. When you open License Management, you will find that it is unregistered, and the perfect verify function cannot be turned on.
Since the sandbox environment is unified, this issue should be a common problem that everyone encounters. Please test it again, thank you.
Dimar0n
SCREENSHOT
I do not need to test anything again, I use this program constantly and I have no problem.
Comment edited: 5 September 2025, 11:07
aleksandar
2025-09-05-1.png
I can get this screenshot too.
But when you open the License Manager, you get unauthorised.
2025-09-05-2.png
Are you sure you are using Perfect Verify under 64bit?
2025-09-05-3.png
Even if you are unauthorised, you can still use the free features with «Pro» in the title bar due to the cracking effect.
Dimar0n
Do you use an online check and want registration to show you? Do you need to use the program or have “different” inscriptions in the program interface? The program works without problems and it is only important for us. We do not discuss the presence or absence of different «inscriptions». The request not to clog in the future the topic with such comments…
Comment edited: 8 September 2025, 06:54
aleksandar
Comment edited: 6 September 2025, 08:19
Dimar0n
Violation of the rules — paragraph 11, the comment is removed. 

I wrote to you 100 times that online checking the license will not lead to anything, the program is not activated using a license, but applied a crack from the XANAX.  Everything works for me, the video is.  Enough to spam on this topic! My next answer will be the bank of your account for 7 days…
aleksandar
Finally, thank you for uploading Elchupacabra's repack; it's working fine for me too.
I thought I should at least send a message to thank you for uploading a new valid repack for me, even if you've been misunderstanding me and may think this is spam too. Have a nice day. 01

After reviewing your video, I realized you're using the Elchupacabra's repack you uploaded today, not the original that FC repacked. Just look at your cracked file size, and compare the file sizes in my video. That's why you think I'm a fool.
Also, please check your message above. You posted in Russian, and you have spelling errors in English, which is why I'm replying in Russian to help you understand.
I didn't intend to violate the rules.